Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
medrxiv; 2023.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2023.06.08.23291050

ABSTRACT

Researchers and policymakers have proposed systems to detect novel pathogens early by monitoring samples from hospital patients, wastewater, and air travel, in order to mitigate future pandemics. How much benefit would such systems offer? We developed, empirically validated, and mathematically characterized a quantitative model that simulates disease spread and detection time for any given disease and detection system. We find that hospital monitoring could have detected COVID-19 in Wuhan 0.4 weeks earlier than it was actually discovered, at 2,300 cases compared to 3,400. Wastewater monitoring would not have accelerated COVID-19 detection in Wuhan, but provides benefit in smaller catchments and for asymptomatic or long-incubation diseases like polio or HIV/AIDS. Monitoring of air travel provides little benefit in most scenarios we evaluated. In sum, early detection systems can substantially mitigate some future pandemics, but would not have changed the course of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , HIV Infections , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
2.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.05.12.21257117

ABSTRACT

Background: Despite rising rates of vaccination, quarantine remains critical to control SARS-CoV-2 transmission. COVID-19 quarantine length around the world varies in part due to the limited amount of empirical data. Objective: To assess post-quarantine transmission risk for various quarantine lengths. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Four US universities, September 2020 to February 2021. Participants: 3,641 students and staff were identified as close contacts to SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals. They entered strict or non-strict quarantine and were tested on average twice per week for SARS-CoV-2. Strict quarantine included designated housing with a private room, private bathroom and meal delivery. Non-strict quarantine potentially included interactions with household members. Measurements: Dates of exposure and last negative and first positive tests during quarantine. Results: Of the 418 quarantined individuals who eventually converted to positive, 11%, 4.2%, and 1.2% were negative and asymptomatic on days 7, 10 and 14, respectively. The US CDC recently shortened its quarantine guidance from 14 to 7 days based on estimates of 2.3-8.6% post-quarantine transmission risk at day 7, significantly below the 11% risk we report here. Notably, 6% of individuals tested positive after day 7 in strict quarantine, versus 14% in non-strict quarantine. Ongoing exposure during quarantine likely explains the higher rate of COVID-19 in non-strict quarantine. Limitations: Quarantine should be longer for individuals using antigen testing, given antigen testing's lower sensitivity than qPCR. Results apply in settings in which SAR-CoV-2 variants do not affect latent period. Conclusions: To maintain the 5% transmission risk that the CDC used in its guidance, our data suggest that quarantine with qPCR testing 1 day before intended release should extend to 10 days for non-strict quarantine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL